What is the most effective strategy for stress management-various aspects-
Stress management comprises a broad range of techniques and psychotherapies designed to regulate an individual’s level of psychological stress, particularly chronic stress, primarily to enhance the quality of everyday life. Stress results in various physical and mental symptoms that differ based on each person’s situational factors. These may encompass a decrease in physical health, such as headaches, chest pain, fatigue, sleep issues, and depression. The practice of stress management is a crucial element that can contribute to a joyful and successful existence in contemporary society. Stress management offers numerous methods to address anxiety and sustain overall well-being.
Numerous models of stress management exist, each providing unique explanations of the mechanisms involved in managing stress. Additional research is required to enhance understanding of which mechanisms truly function and prove effective in real-life applications.
Management Techniques
A variety of stress management techniques address stress that individuals may encounter. Some methods listed below alleviate an elevated stress level temporarily, to offset the biological concerns involved; others confront the stressors at a more abstract level:
Autogenic training
Social activity
Cognitive therapy
Conflict resolution
Cranial release technique
Getting a hobby
Meditation
Mindfulness
Music as a coping strategy
Deep breathing
Yoga Nidra
Nootropics
Reading novels
Prayer
Relaxation techniques
Artistic expression
Fractional relaxation
Humour
Physical exercise
Progressive relaxation
Spas
Somatics training
Spending time in nature
Stress balls
Natural medicine
Clinically validated alternative treatments
Time management
Planning and decision making
Listening to certain types of relaxing music
Spending quality time with pets
Certain stresses arise from high demand levels that burden the individual with additional effort and tasks. In such cases, a new schedule can be formulated, reducing the regular frequency and duration of previous routines until the phase of unusually high personal demand has concluded.
Stress management techniques will differ according to the philosophical framework.
Historical foundations
Walter Cannon and Hans Selye utilized animal studies to create the earliest scientific foundation for stress research. They assessed the physiological reactions of animals to external forces, such as temperature extremes, prolonged confinement, and surgical interventions, then deduced from these tests to human experiences.
Later investigations of stress in humans conducted by Richard Rahe and others demonstrated that stress stems from specific, quantifiable life stressors and that these stressors can be prioritized based on the median level of stress they induce (leading to the Holmes and Rahe stress scale). The focus of Holmes and Rahe is on how life’s stressors can impact one’s health and well-being. This scale was designed to evaluate the effects of stress on health using life change units, striving to quantify stress and its relationship to illness. Consequently, stress has been historically perceived as a consequence of external attacks beyond the control of those experiencing the stress. However, more recently, it has been contended that external factors lack any inherent ability to cause stress, but rather, their impact is influenced by an individual’s perceptions, abilities, and understanding.
There are numerous stress management models, each offering unique explanations of the mechanisms for managing stress. Additional research is needed to enhance the understanding of which mechanisms are truly functional and effective in practical situations.
For update on further important health related topics and frequently asked questions on health topics by general population please click on the link given below to join our WhatsApp group –
https://chat.whatsapp.com/Lv3NbcguOBS5ow6X9DpMMA
Models
The generalized models include:
The emergency response/fight-or-flight response developed by Walter Cannon (1914, 1932)
General Adaptation Syndrome formulated by Hans Selye (1936)
Stress Model by Henry and Stephens (1977)
Transactional (or cognitive) Stress Model / stress model of Lazarus following Lazarus (1974)
Theory of resource conservation presented by Stevan Hobfoll (1988, 1998; Hobfoll and Buchwald, 2004)
Transactional model
In 1981, Richard Lazarus and Susan Folkman proposed that stress could be conceptualized as a result of an “imbalance between demands and resources” or as arising when “pressure exceeds one’s perceived ability to cope. ” The development of stress management was based on the notion that stress is not a direct reaction to a stressor but, instead, an individual’s resources and capacities to manage and mediate the stress reaction, which can be modified, thereby allowing stress to be manageable.
Transactional Model of Stress and Coping by Richard Lazarus
Among the various stressors cited by employees, the following are the most frequent:
Conflicts in the workplace
How the organization treats its employees
To create an effective stress management program, it is essential first to identify the key factors that contribute to a person managing his/her stress and to determine the intervention strategies that effectively address these factors. Lazarus and Folkman’s perspective on stress emphasizes the interaction between individuals and their external environment (known as the Transactional Model). The model asserts that stress may not be classified as such if the individual does not view the stressors as threatening, but rather as positive or even as a challenge. Furthermore, if the individual has or can utilize sufficient coping skills, then stress may not actually arise or be influenced by the stressors. The model suggests that individuals can be taught to manage their stress and cope with their stressors. They can learn to shift their perspective on the stressors, equipping them with the ability and confidence to enhance their lives and manage all types of stressors.
Health realization/innate health model
The health realization/innate health model of stress is based on the concept that stress does not necessarily arise from the existence of a possible stressor. Rather than concentrating on the individual’s assessment of so-called stressors concerning their own coping mechanisms (as outlined in the transactional model), the health realization model emphasizes the essence of thought, asserting that it is ultimately an individual’s thought processes that shape the reaction to potentially stressful external situations. In this model, stress emerges from evaluating oneself and one’s situation through a mental filter of insecurity and negativity, whereas a sense of well-being is derived from engaging with the world with a “quiet mind. ” This theory posits that moods vary and cannot be altered by a specific thinking pattern. Focusing on how to change one’s mood merely intensifies mental discomfort; thus, moods should be “waited out” and ruminating should be avoided according to this framework. This model suggests that assisting stressed individuals in comprehending the nature of thought—particularly enabling them to identify when they are entangled in insecure thinking, detach from it, and access natural positive emotions—will alleviate their stress.
Stress prevention and resilience
Although numerous techniques have historically been established to address the effects of stress, significant research has also been directed towards stress prevention, a topic closely related to the development of psychological resilience. Several self-help strategies for stress-prevention and resilience-building have been created, primarily based on the theory and practice of cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Measuring stress
There are various methods to assess stress levels. One method is through psychological testing. The Holmes and Rahe Stress Scale is employed to evaluate stressful life events and the impact of life stressors on illness. The DASS (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales) includes a scale for stress based on self-reported items. Variations in blood pressure and galvanic skin response can also be measured to assess stress levels. A digital thermometer can be utilized to observe fluctuations in skin temperature, which can signify activation of the fight-or-flight response by drawing blood away from the extremities. Cortisol is the primary hormone released during a stress response, and measuring cortisol from hair will provide a 60- to 90-day baseline stress level for an individual. This technique for measuring stress is currently the most favored method in clinical settings.
Even though stress is often perceived as a subjective experience, stress levels can be easily quantified; employing various physiological tests akin to those used in polygraphs. One illustration of measuring stress is the use of nano EEG sensors in detecting stress.
Effectiveness
Stress management offers physiological and immune advantages. Positive results are noted from a combination of non-drug interventions:
treatment of anger or hostility,
autogenic training is a relaxation method utilized to alleviate stress and achieve harmony between the mind and body through consistent exercises, including deep breathing, to encourage mental relaxation. A study conducted by L. Varvogli and C. Darviri indicates that this method offers numerous therapeutic health advantages, benefiting individuals experiencing tension headaches, heart issues, anxiety, and various other conditions.
talking therapy (focused on relationship or existential concerns)
biofeedback enables individuals to track their body’s internal functions such as heart rate, muscle tension, and temperature, using this data to learn how to regulate the body’s reactions, which can result in improved physical, mental, and emotional well-being. While some view it as effective, critics have compared its effectiveness to traditional therapies, and the cost-effectiveness of biofeedback remains uncertain.
cognitive therapy for anxiety or major depression
Stress management programs
Numerous companies have started implementing stress management programs for employees struggling to cope with stress at home or in the workplace. Certain organizations supply specialized tools for managing stress in the office, such as coloring diaries and stress-relief devices. A significant number of individuals experience spillover stress from home to their work settings. There are several strategies that businesses employ to help lessen their employees’ stress levels. One method involves individual intervention. This begins by tracking the individual’s stressors. After identifying the sources of stress, the next step is to tackle those stressors and explore ways to mitigate them. Cultivating social support is crucial in individual intervention, as spending time with others to assist in coping has been shown to be a highly effective method for reducing stress. [citation needed] Modifying behavioral patterns can also contribute to decreasing some of the stress experienced in the workplace.
Employee assistance programs may encompass in-house counseling initiatives focused on stress management. Research has been conducted on EAPs that educate individuals on stress control and inoculation techniques, including relaxation, biofeedback, and cognitive restructuring. Findings suggest that these programs can lower the physiological arousal levels linked to high stress. Participants who become proficient in behavioral and cognitive stress-relief techniques report decreased tension, fewer sleep disruptions, and an enhanced capacity to handle workplace stressors.
An additional approach to minimizing stress at work involves simply adjusting an employee’s workload or granting them more autonomy regarding when or where they work.
Enhancing communication among employees proves to be very effective in alleviating stress. Making employees feel like they are more integral to the company by involving them in larger matters demonstrates trust and value in their perspectives. Encouraging all employees to collaborate is a fundamental aspect that can reduce much of the stress in the workplace. Finally, modifying the physical characteristics of the workplace may also help lower stress levels. Changes such as altering lighting, air temperature, scents, and updating technology can contribute to a more stress-free environment.
Intervention is divided into three phases: primary, secondary, tertiary. Primary focuses on completely removing the stressors. Secondary involves identifying stress and finding methods to manage it better and enhance stress management abilities. Lastly, tertiary addresses recuperation and the complete rehabilitation of stress. These three phases are generally the most efficient methods to handle stress not only in the workplace, but in general.
Types of stress
Acute stress
Acute stress is the most prevalent type of stress experienced by people globally. It concerns the demands of the immediate future or the very recent past. Although acute stress is frequently viewed as a negative experience, it can actually be beneficial and even essential for one’s wellbeing due to its protective effects against potentially hazardous threats. Slamming on the brakes while driving to avoid a car accident might be regarded as a moment of advantageous acute stress. Engaging in running or any other form of exercise is also classified as an acute stressor. Some thrilling or exhilarating activities, like riding a roller coaster, is considered acute stress but is generally very enjoyable. Acute stress is short-term and, therefore, does not have sufficient time to inflict the harm that long-term stress creates.
Chronic stress
In contrast to acute stress, which lasts for mere moments, chronic stress endures for extended periods. It has a draining effect on individuals that can pose a serious health risk if it persists over a lengthy timeframe.
Chronic stress can result in memory impairment, harm spatial awareness, and cause a reduced appetite. Other signs of chronic stress include physical aches and pains, insomnia or various sleep disturbances, alterations in social behaviors, low energy levels, emotional detachment, or other changes in emotional reactions, and unfocused thinking. Chronic stress has also been linked to several medical conditions such as hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and arthritis.
The intensity differs from individual to individual. Gender variations may also play a role. Women tend to endure longer periods of stress compared to men without exhibiting the same maladaptive changes. Men can handle brief stress durations more effectively than women can.
Chronic stress is a significant health concern that impacts individuals of all ages and can exert serious effects on both physical and mental health. It is a persistent, unrelieved, and inescapable stress, which encompasses demanding jobs, school commitments, and intricate relationships. Over time, chronic stress can modify the body’s systems, leading to a range of illnesses and conditions.
Stress in the Workplace
Workplace Stress
In a work setting, managing stress becomes crucial to maintaining job performance as well as relationships with coworkers and supervisors. For certain employees, altering the work environment alleviates work-related stress. Creating a less competitive atmosphere among staff reduces levels of stress. [citation needed] Organizations and businesses are often more prosperous when the workplace promotes cooperation rather than rivalry. In the workplace, individuals feel more relaxed and capable of accomplishing their tasks due to support from colleagues and supervisors. Consequently, both organizations and employees gain from a collaborative relationship. Competition in the workplace can leave employees feeling like it is “every person for themselves,” which can heighten stress.
Author J, Carr pointed out three aspects of the workplace that influence the amount of stress experienced. Job demands, individual differences, and social demands. These factors that amplify stress are examined in Rahe’s scale, indicating that some of life’s most significant stressors are related to the workplace. Stress at work does not necessarily have to be perceived negatively. When effectively managed, stress can enhance employees’ concentration and productivity. According to the Yerkes–Dodson law, stress can be advantageous for human functioning, but only to a certain degree. Individuals who face very minimal levels of stress may feel under-stimulated and passive, whereas those encountering excessively high levels of stress could feel overwhelmed, anxious, and irritable.
The levels of organizational stress an individual encounters depend not only on external elements like job characteristics or environment, but also on internal factors such as personality, temperament, and individual coping and thinking styles. [citation needed]
Moreover, workplace stress is not exclusive to employees. Entrepreneurs also experience stress. This stress may arise from team management, business administration, or negative government policies.
Commitment
Illustrations of stressors in the workplace can include how employees perceive Organizational Commitment, which refers to how an employee interprets his/her motivations for remaining in the organization for either Affective, Continuance, or Normative reasons. Affective commitment to the organization occurs when an employee profoundly aligns with the organization’s values and culture. This does not directly indicate an employee’s stress levels; rather, it reflects a genuine interest and enjoyment in the employee’s work and work relationships, enabling the employee to manage stress effectively. Employees who remain in an organization for continuance reasons do so after evaluating the pros and cons and concluding that the opportunity cost of leaving the organization is too significant. Employees in this category might experience moderate levels of stress, as their motivations for staying are more influenced by external than internal factors.
Salary
Salary can also be a significant concern for employees. Salary can influence how people perform their work, as they might strive for promotion and, consequently, a higher salary.
Culture Differences
Cultural differences have also revealed significant impacts on issues related to stress coping. Eastern Asian workers might handle specific job situations differently than a worker from Western North America. A research study carried out in Malaysia indicated that while the categories of workplace stress are comparable between Malaysians and Western employees, the interpretation of workplace stress and the methods for coping with it were distinct. To effectively handle stress in the work environment, employers can implement stress management programs such as counseling, communication initiatives, and more adaptable work schedules. Numerous studies have been performed showing the advantages of mindfulness practices on personal well-being and job performance. There is an increase in productivity, organization, and performance, while rates of burnout decline. Employees who received either minimal or substantial assistance from their supervisors regarding stress management generally viewed the program positively. This viewpoint was articulated in terms of the intervention either offsetting or enhancing their work environment, depending on the level of assistance provided.
Stress in the Medical environment
A study was conducted on the levels of stress among general practitioners and hospital consultants in 1999. More than 500 medical professionals took part in this study conducted by R. P Caplan. The findings indicated that 47% of the participants reported high levels of stress according to their questionnaire results. Furthermore, 27% of the general practitioners were found to be very depressed. The levels of stress among managers were not as elevated as those of the practitioners themselves. A revealing statistic indicated that about 54% of employees experienced anxiety while working in the hospital. Although this represented a limited sample size from hospitals worldwide, Caplan believes this trend is likely to be fairly representative of most hospitals.
Additionally, there is a study indicating that the aim of this study was to explore the connection between job performance and self-reported symptoms of depression, stress, and anxiety among nurses working in tuberculosis (TB)/HIV and COVID-19 units on Timor Island, Indonesia. The study adopted a comparative, cross-sectional design and collected data from October 2020 to January 2021. The participant group consisted of 236 nurses working in TB/HIV isolation units and 423 nurses in COVID-19 isolation units. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-42) along with a work performance questionnaire were utilized for data collection, which was analyzed using independent t-testing and Pearson correlation coefficient. The findings revealed that the average DASS-42 scores of nurses in TB/HIV isolation units were low, signifying minimal effects, while those in COVID-19 isolation units exhibited moderate levels of depression, stress, and anxiety. Moreover, the work performance results showed that the nurses in TB/HIV isolation rooms had satisfactory work performance, whereas those in COVID-19 isolation units demonstrated poorer work performance. A significant difference was found in work performance between the nurses in the two units. The study concluded that there existed a correlation between the levels of depression, stress, and anxiety among nurses and their work performance in TB/HIV and COVID-19 isolation units.
Stress in the Aviation industry
The aviation sector is characterized by high stress levels, as it necessitates a continuous high degree of precision. Prolonged exposure to high stress can eventually diminish performance and jeopardize safety. For effective results, stress measurement tools need to be tailored to the aviation sector due to its distinct working conditions and various stressors. Stress assessment in aviation aims to quantify the psychological stress experienced by aviators, with the intent of facilitating necessary improvements to their coping and stress management skills.
To more accurately measure stress, the numerous duties of aviators are divided into “workloads. ” This categorization aids in defining the broader concept of “stress” by specific stressors. Furthermore, as different workloads may introduce unique stressors, this strategy could prove more efficient than measuring overall stress levels. Consequently, stress measurement tools can assist aviators in identifying which stressors are particularly challenging for them, and aid in enhancing their management of workloads, task planning, and coping with stress more effectively.
To assess workload, several tools may be utilized. The primary categories of measurement tools are:
Performance-based measures;
Subjective measures, such as questionnaires completed by aviators themselves; and
Physiological measures, like the assessment of heart rate.
Implementing evaluation tools necessitates time, measuring instruments, and data collection software.
Measurement systems
The stress measurement systems most frequently utilized are predominantly based on rating scales. These systems are often intricate, featuring multiple tiers with diverse sections, in an effort to capture the numerous stressors found in the aviation sector. Various systems may be applied in different operational specialties.
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) – The PSS is a commonly employed subjective instrument for assessing stress levels. It consists of ten questions, and prompts participants to evaluate, on a five-point scale, how stressed they felt following a specific event. The total score is calculated by summing all ten questions, yielding a score ranging from 0 to 40. For instance, in the aviation field, it has been utilized with flight training students to assess their stress levels after flight training exercises.
The Coping Skills Inventory – This inventory evaluates aviators’ abilities to manage stress. It is another subjective measure that asks participants to assess, on a five-point scale, the frequency with which they employ eight typical coping skills: Substance abuse, Emotional support, Instrumental support (assistance with tangible matters, such as child care, finances, or sharing tasks), Positive reframing (altering one’s perception of a negative event to view it positively), Self-blame, Planning, Humor, and Religion. An individual’s overall score reflects the degree to which they are utilizing effective, positive coping strategies (such as humor and emotional support); ineffective, negative coping methods (like substance abuse and self-blame); and areas for potential enhancement.
The Subjective Workload Assessment Technique (SWAT) – SWAT is a rating system designed to gauge individuals’ perceived mental workload while executing a task, such as developing instruments in a laboratory, juggling aircraft responsibilities, or conducting air defense. SWAT integrates measurement and scaling techniques to create a comprehensive rating scale.
Pilot stress report systems
Initial pilot stress report systems were derived and modified from pre-existing psychological questionnaires and surveys. The information from these pilot-specific surveys is then processed and evaluated using an aviation-centered system or scale. Questionnaires aimed at pilots are typically designed to investigate work-related stress or stress from home. Self-reporting can also be utilized to assess a combination of home stress, work stress, and perceived performance. A study by Fiedler, Della Rocco, Schroeder, and Nguyen (2000) employed Sloan and Cooper’s adaptation of the Alkov questionnaire to investigate aviators’ perceptions of the connection between various types of stress. The findings suggested that pilots felt their performance was compromised when home stress transferred to the workplace. The extent of home stress that transitioned to the work environment showed a significant and negative correlation with flying performance aspects, including planning, control, and landing accuracy. The questionnaire was capable of reflecting pilots’ retrospective perceptions and the precision of these perceptions.
Alkov, Borowsky, and Gaynor initiated a 22-item questionnaire for U. S. Naval aviators in 1982 to evaluate the hypothesis that insufficient stress coping mechanisms led to flight incidents. The questionnaire contains items concerning lifestyle modifications and personality traits. Upon completing the questionnaire, the participants are divided into two categories: “at-fault” with a mishap, and “not-at-fault” in a mishap. Subsequently, the questionnaires from these two segments were scrutinized to identify differences. A study of British commercial airline pilots, carried out by Sloan and Cooper (1986), involved surveying 1,000 pilot members from the British Airline Pilots’ Association (BALPA). They employed a revised version of Alkov, Borowsky, and Gaynor’s questionnaire to gather data on pilots’ perceptions of the correlation between stress and performance. Being a subjective measure, this study’s data depended on pilots’ perceptions, and therefore hinges on how accurately they remember past events in relation to stress. Despite relying on subjective views and recollections, the study indicated that pilot reports are significant.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is another instrument utilized across various sectors, including mental health professions, to assess depressive symptoms.
Parsa and Kapadia (1997) applied the BDI to a group of 57 U. S. Air Force fighter pilots who had participated in combat operations. The adaptation of the BDI to the aviation sector presented challenges. Nonetheless, the study unearthed some surprising results. The findings revealed that 89% of the pilots experienced insomnia; 86% noted irritability; 63% expressed dissatisfaction; 38% felt guilt; and 35% reported a loss of libido. 50% of one squadron and 33% of another squadron scored above 9 on the BDI, indicating at least minimal levels of depression. Such measurements may pose challenges in accurate interpretation.
Stress in College
College can be a challenging period for numerous students, as they adapt to a new and unfamiliar setting while moving from adolescence into adulthood. Nearly 80% of college students state that they routinely encounter daily stress. Factors that affect college students’ levels of stress include family and friends who are frequently physically distant, along with shifts in communication patterns with these people. Long-standing beliefs (i. e. religious convictions) as well as new possibilities for various behaviors (i. e. alcohol and drug consumption) are also important influencing elements. Besides these potential sources of stress, college students face often demanding academic requirements. To handle this stress, students utilize various strategies including both problem-focused and emotion-focused coping.
Problem-focused strategies involve action-oriented behavioral tasks such as planning. Emotion-focused strategies include the expression of feelings and often encompass the adjustment of expectations. Although problem-focused strategies have frequently been shown to be more effective than emotion-focused strategies, both types encompass coping mechanisms that successfully diminish the adverse effects of stress.
There are numerous practical instances of problem-focused or approach-based coping strategies. Importantly, honing time management abilities, steering clear of procrastination, and establishing goals are linked with stress alleviation. These skills enable students to better prioritize new obligations, providing them with additional time for rest and recreational activities, which have been proven to lessen stress. Furthermore, striving for or maintaining healthy sleeping patterns assists individuals in managing elevated levels of stress.
Various emotion-focused strategies have likewise been determined to be successful in counteracting stress. Accommodation strategies that do not directly alter the stressor, but instead modify one’s emotions surrounding the stressors, such as positive reframing, which are broadly associated with stress relief. Approachs like finding humor and journaling—particularly gratitude journaling—are also beneficial.
In the absence of effective coping mechanisms, students often resort to dangerous behaviors as a means of attempting to alleviate the stress they experience. [citation needed] Ineffective coping strategies that are widespread among college students include excessive drinking, substance use, high caffeine intake, withdrawal from social engagements, self-harm, and eating disorders. These ineffective methods can be perilous as they frequently become habitual, addictive, and sometimes even fatal. For instance, when college students rely on alcohol to cope with stress, they tend to consume larger amounts and more regularly, rather than just occasionally with peers. This pattern can lead to alcohol poisoning, addiction, and other hazardous behaviors. The issues generated by these coping techniques can inflict more damage than benefit and often result in increased stress for the student.
Researchers have not identified significant gender differences concerning the use of problem-focused coping strategies by men and women. Nonetheless, there exists gender variation regarding emotion-focused coping. On average, women tend to utilize emotion-focused coping strategies more frequently than men. However, men do report engaging in one emotion-focused coping strategy more regularly than women—mental disengagement through alcohol consumption. Mental disengagement involves individuals redirecting their negative emotions toward an alternative resource, such as alcohol, rather than confronting the original stressor. Overall, women indicate experiencing higher stress levels than men, particularly concerning social relationships, daily hassles, finances, self-imposed stress, frustration, and academics. This may be due to women’s tendency to be more attuned to their emotions and more willing to express their feelings.
Even though stress is a part of the college experience, numerous strategies are available for students to help alleviate stress in their lives and manage its effects. Time management techniques, which include goal setting, scheduling, and pacing, are effective methods for mitigating stress. Furthermore, students should maintain their physical and mental health through regular exercise, nutritious eating, healthy sleep habits, and practices focused on mindfulness. Various services, such as counseling and therapy, are offered to students, both on and off campus, to aid in stress management and overall wellbeing. College adults benefit similarly from techniques more directly associated with stress management (like time management and relaxation exercises) and maintaining physical activity (like incorporating running or weightlifting into their regular schedules).
One popular method for relieving stress that college students often adopt is participating in gaming as a hobby. While some research proposes a negative connection between video game usage and academic performance, several studies reveal a positive link between stress reduction and playing casual video games. For example, one study showed that playing casual video games significantly lowered psychological and physiological stress levels among students, with benefits comparable to those of stress-relieving meditation. When combined with proper time management, video gaming can act as an effective stress-relief strategy for college students.
For update on further important health related topics and frequently asked questions on health topics by general population please click on the link given below to join our WhatsApp group –
https://chat.whatsapp.com/Lv3NbcguOBS5ow6X9DpMMA
Issued in public interest by –
www.entspecialistinnashik.com
